Research: These popular brand-safety tactics may be slashing audience reach
In November 2018, Digiday conducted a survey of 274 industry pros from brands, agencies and publishers. We found that most marketers are at least somewhat pleased with the steps that prominent social media platforms have taken to address brand safety since 2017.
Click here to download our full report on brand safety.
Twitter: a clean bill of health
Twitter, which has spent the past year booting unsavory and fraudulent accounts, was rated as the least hazardous environment:
- In our 2017 survey, only one percent of respondents cited Twitter as the most brand-safe social platform platform
- In 2018 percent, the number was 45 percent — a significant plurality of respondents.
Last year, LinkedIn came out on top. Of course, we’re likely not experiencing a fall from grace on the part of the career platform; the shift likely speaks well of Twitter, not poorly of LinkedIn—only four percent of respondents called the latter a brand-unsafe platform this year.
Ad position: web_incontent_pos1
For Twitter, its progress is a symptom of a larger trend: Social platforms have spent much of the past year booting controversial accounts (e.g. Infowars) from their platforms. Some users may not have approved — but marketers did.
Overtreatment
62 percent of respondents said that blacklists — pre-prepared lists of sites where marketers’ ads can’t run — have been their most effective brand safety treatment over the past year, up from 50 percent a year ago. But 69 percent said that using some prominent brand safety tactics, including blacklisting and whitelisting, have inoculated their brands against reaching specific audiences. Last year it was only 30 percent.
Ad position: web_incontent_pos2
Innovative therapies
Computer vision, also known as image recognition, may be the most promising technology when it comes to treating brand safety episodes. It can analyze and identify objects with extreme accuracy. In many ways, image recognition is a cure while blacklisting and whitelisting are merely palliative measures; it enables marketers to venture into seemingly unsafe publisher territory without fear.
31 percent of respondents cited image recognition as amongst their most effective technologies when it comes to mitigating brand safety concerns. A year ago, it was 18 percent. In other words, many of the respondents who were already using it a year ago are now more convinced of its value.
More from Digiday
Sliders test article
Amazon bulldozes into new markets, upending the status quo and challenging rivals. Today, it’s the turn of the ad-supported streaming world, and Amazon is coming out of the gate strong. Why, you ask? Because Amazon is serving marketers an opportunity beginning today to reach a whopping 115 million monthly viewers in the U.S. alone, courtesy […]
How CTV and DOOH are growing this political season for smaller agencies
Connected TV and digital out-of-home are playing a bigger role in upcoming elections and politics – especially for smaller agencies looking to place clients’ dollars.
CMO Strategies: Advertisers identify the top attributes on ad-supported streaming platforms
This is the third installment in Digiday’s multi-part series covering the top ad-supported streaming services and part of Digiday’s CMO Strategies series. In this report, we examine which ad attributes matter the most to marketers on streaming platforms.
Ad position: web_bfu