3 Ways to Make the Yahoo/Microsoft/AOL Alliance Work


All signs point to Microsoft, Yahoo and AOL joining forces to compete with Google in the display advertising exchange business. Much of the sentiment has focused on the downsides of this group and their individual weaknesses. But it could work, if done correctly. Here are three suggestions to build a truly competitive alternative to Google in this critical market:

Make it independent: The reason why these companies are willing to explore a joint venture with their competitors is that all three have badly missed the product cycle of real-time bidding and they are starting to feel significant pain in their core businesses as a result. A classic innovator’s dilemma is what caused this to happen. RTB as a standard creates numerous issues for their sacred cow of high-priced premium inventory and they have understandably hoped it would fail. Now that it has become clear to even them that RTB is becoming the new online buying standard, they realize they must do something. Yet the cultures of their organizations have been so opposed to RTB for so long that politics will kill any internal effort. Only an independent entity with its own P&L and equity structure has any hope of escaping the long knives. Joint ventures between competitors don’t have a great history in the media industry, but Hulu showed they can sometimes work quite well.

Build or buy new technology: An attempt to repurpose existing technologies such as Right Media is a bad idea. It is simply too late for any of their display technology solutions, as the innovation in the RTB space over the last three years has made all fundamentally obsolete. The reason why they are in this difficult spot is because their existing technology didn’t keep up, and adopting antiquated technology would doom this effort from the very start.

Make it an ecosystem: Incentivizing the rest of the industry to support this venture would be one of the smartest things they could do. A very easy way to do this is to structure the entity like a stock exchange where the participants own the exchange. If they simply enabled other media companies to get an ownership stake in exchange for committing impressions and startup capital, they could very quickly build a very sizable entity able to compete with Google. Creating such an exchange with diversified ownership would also go a long way to allaying the concerns many have about singular owners of exchanges also being participants a la Google.

This industry is too important for one player to dominate. I hope the Big Three can get their acts together and provide a needed credible alternative.

Zach Coelius is CEO of Triggit, a demand-side platform. Follow him on Twitter @zachcoelius.


More in Media

YouTube is under fire again, this time over child protection

Adalytics Research asks, ‘Are YouTube advertisers inadvertently harvesting data from millions of children?’

Illustration of a puzzle that spells out the word 'media.'

Media Briefing: Publishers pump up per-subscriber revenue amid ad revenue declines

Publishers’ Q2 earnings reveal digital advertising is still in a tight spot, but digital subscriptions are picking up steam.

Lessons for AI from the ad-tech era: ‘We’re living in a memory-less world’

Experts reflect how the failures of social media and online advertising can help the industry improve the next era of innovation.