Save 50% on a 3-month Digiday+ membership. Ends Dec 5.
Tom Scott is a 27-year-old London native and freelance Web developer. Scott says he has been making stuff for the Web pretty much ever since he’s had an Internet connection. His latest project is getting some Web buzz, and it’s called Klouchebag, which measure “how much of an asshat you are on Twitter.” The criteria for calculating your Klouchebag score uses the “ARSE” rating system (as outlined at the bottom of the site): “Anger: profanity and rage. Retweets: “please RT”s, no or constant retweeting, and old-style. Social Apps: every useless checkin on foursquare or its horrible brethren. And English Usage: if you use EXCLAMATION MARKS OMG!!! or no capitals at all, this’ll be quite high.” The silly app perfectly captures the backlash against social importance measures like Klout, which some believe use pseudo-science to create a social media hierarchy. Also, everyone loves to make fun of self-important types in social media, even Digiday. Scott took time with Digiday to answer some questions about Klouchebag and the social Web.
How did you come up with the idea for Klouchebag?
I had the idea yesterday, after reading this article in Wired. I’d been annoyed with the idea of Klout for a while, and that crystallized it. Today, I registered the domain name (sadly, “klunt.com” was already taken) and built it in a couple of hours of spare time.
What do you think are the worst Twitter offenses that people are guilty of?
I do worry that I’m being a bit too prescriptive. I studied linguistics at university, and one of the most important lessons I learned was that it doesn’t matter what words you use, or how you spell them, as long as they don’t distract from the message. That said, I can’t stand anyone using paper.li.
How do you feel about the social Web? Are you personally an avid consumer of social media?
It’s brilliant, provided you realize that you can always turn it off. Nothing important ever happens solely on the Internet. And there’s no such thing as being “famous online.” That’s like being “famous on the fax machines.”
What about Klout? Do you think Klout scores have any value?
Klout is one of the worst ideas ever put online. Klout annoys me for the same reason that search engine optimization annoys me: It’s an enormous amount of effort designed to game an arbitrary and often-changing system. Imagine if all that time went into actually making interesting things, or caring about the people around you. To quote the WOPR computer from “War Games”: “the only way to win is not to play.”
I see you have quite a lot of random, entertaining videos, too. Where do you get the ideas for all of your projects? What motivates you to make stuff?
I get the ideas while talking to friends — frequently while I’m in the pub! And as for motivation, well, the alternative is not making something. The alternative is getting beaten to it by someone else. The alternative is wondering for the rest of your life what might have happened. The worst that can happen is failure.
More in Media
Digiday+ Research Subscription Index 2025: Subscription strategies from Bloomberg, The New York Times, Vox and others
Digiday’s third annual Subscription Index examines and measures publishers’ subscription strategies to identify common approaches and key tactics among Bloomberg, The New York Times, Vox and others.
From lawsuits to lobbying: How publishers are fighting AI
We may be closing out 2025, but publishers aren’t retreating from the battle of AI search — some are escalating it, and they expect the fight to stretch deep into 2026.
Media Briefing: Publishers turn to vertical video to compete with creators and grow ad revenue in 2026
Publishers add vertical video feeds to their sites to boost engagement, attract video ad spend and compete with news creators.
Ad position: web_bfu